Category

Why same sex marriage should be legal

Prior to their decision, same-sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and Washington DC, but was banned in the remaining Proponents of legal gay marriage contend that gay marriage bans are discriminatory and unconstitutional, and that same-sex couples should have access to all the benefits enjoyed by different-sex couples. Opponents contend that marriage has traditionally been defined as being between one man and one woman, and that marriage is primarily for procreation. Read more background…. We have joined together to recognize equality for racial minorities, women, people with disabilities, immigrants… [Legalizing gay marriage] is the right thing to do and it is time. As explained by David S. There are 1, benefits, rights and protections available to married couples in federal law alone, according to a General Accounting Office assessment made in Harvard University historian Nancy F. Since the US Supreme Court has declared 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right for all, according to the American Foundation for Equal Rights. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
private castings x 15
sex dating games free
ethiopian music teddy afro new music
hermione big tits

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from.
best nude female blow jobs

Importance of Government

Same-sex marriage has been legalized in twenty-eight countries, including the United States, and civil unions are recognized in many Western democracies. Civil Society. Javier Corrales, a professor at Amherst College who focuses on LGBT rights in Latin America, points to income levels and the influence of religion in politics, as well as the overall strength of democracy, to explain regional divergences [PDF]. While same-sex marriage has made the most gains in Western democracies, antidiscrimination laws are gaining traction worldwide. In , seventy-three countries, including some that retain sodomy laws, had protections against employment discrimination [PDF] based on gender identity or sexual orientation. Activists in the international arena have focused on antiviolence and antidiscrimination campaigns rather than same-sex marriage. She adds that not all countries that allow same-sex marriage allow couples to jointly adopt and cautions against equating the right to marry with freedom from discrimination. The U. Supreme Court ruled on June 26, [PDF], that the Constitution grants same-sex couples the right to marry, effectively legalizing same-sex marriage in the thirteen states where it remained banned. The five-to-four ruling, which extends to U.
deviant otternaked woman with food

Navigation menu

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By continuing to browse the site you consent to the use of cookies. Learn more. Same-sex marriage has been an intense topic of conversation for quite some time. Some are for it while others are against or on the fence. Even though the reasons why same-sex marriage should be legal outweigh the reasons against it, all individuals deserve the right to marry whomever they choose and, even more importantly, have that union legally recognized. Fortunately, many are pro-same-sex marriage, and because of consistent effort, the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is a right protected by the U. Constitution in ALL the states. Despite the Supreme Court ruling, opposing viewpoints remain, but perhaps those who oppose do not fully understand the importance of same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage should be legal because it provides equal benefits to all.
big brother topless beach

Prior to their decision, same-sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and Washington DC, but was banned in the remaining Proponents of legal gay marriage contend that gay marriage bans are discriminatory and unconstitutional, and that same-sex couples should have access to all the benefits enjoyed by different-sex couples.

Opponents contend that marriage has traditionally been defined as being between one man and one woman, and that marriage is primarily for procreation. Read more background…. We have joined together to recognize equality for racial minorities, women, people with disabilities, immigrants… [Legalizing gay marriage] is the right thing to do and it is time.

As explained by David S. There are 1, benefits, rights and protections available to married couples in federal law alone, according to a General Accounting Office assessment made in Harvard University historian Nancy F. Since the US Supreme Court has declared 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right for all, according to the American Foundation for Equal Rights. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

Non-discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation has therefore become an internationally recognized principle. Ability or desire to create offspring has never been a qualification for marriage. A June peer-reviewed University of Melbourne study showed that children raised by same-sex parents score about six percent higher than the general population on measures of general health and family cohesion. We should see this as a great boon that gay marriage could bring to kids who need nothing more than two loving parents.

A study published on Apr. Rather, anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies. Massachusetts, which became the first US state to legalize gay marriage in , had the lowest divorce rate in the country in Alaska, which altered its constitution to prohibit gay marriage in , saw a The seven states with the highest divorce rates between and all had constitutional prohibitions to gay marriage.

Religious institutions can decline to marry gay and lesbian couples if they wish, but they should not dictate marriage laws for society at large. In America, the distinction can get blurry because states permit clergy to carry out both religious and civil marriage in a single ceremony. Religious Right leaders have exploited that confusion by claiming that granting same-sex couples equal access to civil marriage would somehow also redefine the religious institution of marriage… this is grounded in falsehood and deception.

So long defined, the tradition is measured in millennia, not centuries or decades. So widely shared, the tradition until recently had been adopted by all governments and major religions of the world. Allowing gay marriage would only further shift the purpose of marriage from producing and raising children to adult gratification.

Seemingly infertile heterosexual couples sometimes produce children, and medical advances may allow others to procreate in the future. Heterosexual couples who do not wish to have children are still biologically capable of having them, and may change their minds.

Girls who are raised apart from their fathers are reportedly at higher risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy. Do we need to confuse future generations of Americans even more about the role and importance of an institution that is so critical to the stability of our country? Anderson, William E. Maryland ended health insurance benefits for new domestic partnerships after same-sex marriage became legal in the state in The gay community has created its own vibrant culture.

By reducing the differences in opportunities and experiences between gay and heterosexual people, this unique culture may cease to exist. Lesbian activist M. The family is the microcosm of oppression.

Peter S. On Dec. The US Constitution contains no explicit right to marry. They will be taught that opposition to both was motivated by ignorance and hatred. Privileges available to couples in civil unions and domestic partnerships can include health insurance benefits, inheritance without a will, the ability to file state taxes jointly, and hospital visitation rights.

Now, having said that, states ought to be able to have the right to pass laws that enable people to be able to have rights like others. Did You Know? On May 17, , the first legal gay marriage in the United States was performed in Cambridge, MA between Tanya McCloskey, a massage therapist, and Marcia Kadish, an employment manager at an engineering firm.

The world's first legal gay marriage ceremony took place in the Netherlands on Apr. The four couples, one female and three male, were married in a televised ceremony officiated by the mayor of Amsterdam.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated on Dec. An Oct. People who view this page may also like: 1. Are people born gay? Pros and cons in debate over origin of sexual orientation 3. History of the Same-Sex Marriage Debate, - present.

Proper citation depends on your preferred or required style manual. Here are the proper bibliographic citations for this page according to four style manuals in alphabetical order :. Skip to content. Gay Marriage. Should Gay Marriage Be Legal?

Pro 2 Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. Pro 5 Marriage is an internationally recognized human right for all people. Pro 6 Same-sex marriage is a civil right. Pro 7 Marriage is not only for procreation, otherwise infertile couples or couples not wishing to have children would be prevented from marrying.

Pro 8 Gay marriages can bring financial gain to federal, state, and local governments and can help boost the economy. Pro 9 Gay couples make good parents. Pro 10 Gay marriage bans cause humiliation and uncertainty for children being raised by same-sex couples. Pro 11 Marriage provides both physical and psychological health benefits, and banning gay marriage increases rates of psychological disorders. Pro 12 Legalizing gay marriage will not harm the institution of marriage, and same-sex marriages may even be more stable than heterosexual marriages.

Pro 13 Gay marriage legalization is correlated with lower divorce rates, while gay marriage bans are correlated with higher divorce rates.

Pro 14 Legal marriage is a secular institution that should not be limited by religious objections to same-sex marriage. Pro 15 Many religious leaders and churches support gay marriage and say it is consistent with scripture. Con 1 The institution of marriage has traditionally been defined as being between a man and a woman. Con 2 Marriage is for procreation and should not be extended to same-sex couples because they cannot produce children together.

Con 3 Children need both a mother and a father. Con 5 Allowing gay couples to wed could further weaken the institution of marriage. Con 6 Homosexuality is immoral and unnatural.

Con 7 Gay marriage is contrary to the word of God and is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. Con 8 Legalizing gay marriage often leads to an end to domestic partnership benefits for gay and straight couples, which disadvantages couples who choose not to get married.

Con 9 Gay marriage will accelerate the assimilation of gays into mainstream heterosexual culture to the detriment of the homosexual community. Con 10 Marriage is an outmoded, oppressive institution that should be weakened, not expanded. Con 11 People should not have their tax dollars used to support something they believe is wrong. Con 12 Marriage is a privilege, not a right. Con 14 Civil unions and domestic partnerships can provide the protections and benefits gay couples need without changing the definition of marriage.

Our Latest Updates archived after 30 days. Contact us. Chicago 17th ed. MLA 8th ed. Turabian 8th ed. Last modified on July 10, Accessed August 14, Pros and cons in debate over origin of sexual orientation.



53 :: 54 :: 55 :: 56 :: 57 :: 58 :: 59
Comments
  • Tusho23 days agoSame-sex Marriage and Constitutional Law It absolutely agree with the previous messageA Right to Marry?
Comments
  • Yotilar2 days agoI apologise, but it not absolutely approaches me.
Comments
  • Miran12 days agoI can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.Share this story You are mistaken.
Comments
  • Doramar16 days agoThanks for an explanation.United States In it something is.
Comments
  • Moogujora1 days agoWrite here or in PM. I am sorry, that has interfered... This situation is familiar To me. I invite to discussion.